CoppeliaSim forums

In my small working example to reproduce the bug I have two remote API clients that communicate to 4 remote API servers. The clients connect to the simulation, restart (stop/start) the simulation, print something to two terminals and console of the simulator (via remote API calls). If I do that with...

Hi Uli_v, I'm trying to replicate the crash to no avail. Can you try to compile the plugin in debug mode and have it crashing within the debugger to see exactly at which line is crashing? How do I compile the plugin in debug mode? I can run my code in debug mode, but it might take some time until i...

Any idea where I would need to look at to fix the problem? Is there a threading issue? Is it the remoteAPI? It seems to happen only if I run several instances of V-REP with several instances of remote API clients (python). I am running V3.5.0. *** buffer overflow detected ***: /home/uli/Software/V-R...

I just found that I have the same issue with looking through objects. I agree with davicarnauba84. In the real world, if an object is too close to the depth sensor, then the depth readings become 0 (at least for the Intel Realsense SR300). The problem is that the shapes are not solid (they are meshe...

Thanks, that allows me to export the simplified shape. When I try to import the shape with sim.importShape then it seems that the orientation is not as the original exported shape. Do you have any idea how to fix this? I noticed that in some cases the orientation is correct, but sometimes I have to ...

Hi, Thanks, that was helpful. I am trying to export the simplified mesh, but I get an error when using; formatId = simAssimp.getExportFormat(4) simAssimp.exportMeshes(allVertices,allIndices,"simple.stl",formatId) Error message: argument 1&2: expected non-empty tables. (simAssimp.export...

Hi, Thanks for the reply. Could you post a short LUA script example (or even a example scene) that would accomplish that for a single object/mesh? If I know the object handle of the mesh I want to simplify, then how to I use that with sim.getDecimatedMesh and sim.getQHull. It seems that these functi...

Hi,

I was wondering, if I simplify the shapes (e.g. generate the convex hull) of imported meshes, would this speed up the collision checking? If yes, would it be worth it (what would be the factor of speedup)? I guess it depends on the number and complexity of the shapes. Thanks.

Best,
Uli

I also tried to do a query via PRM after building a roadmap. There seem to be missing implementation/bug in the OMPL-plugin, see my post here: viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7707&p=30124&hilit=PRM#p30124

Hi, For multiquery I had to clear the solutions from a previous query, or otherwise it returns the solution for previous start config if previous solution is better (lower cost). I also had to add PRMstar ( || task->algorithm == sim_ompl_algorithm_PRMstar). See function below: void setStartState(SSc...