Search found 14 matches

by ohnowhathaveidone
03 Dec 2020, 12:49
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: Simulator won't run on Ubuntu 20.04 64-bit - Undefined symbol
Replies: 5
Views: 299

Re: Simulator won't run on Ubuntu 20.04 64-bit - Undefined symbol

As a side note: should you want to run the coppeliaSim binary directly (e. g. for headless simulations or if you want gdb/valgrind it), you can first run source coppeliaSim.sh to set the environment variables correctly in your shell session. After this, you can start the binary directly (in that one...
by ohnowhathaveidone
26 Oct 2020, 15:51
Forum: General questions
Topic: ExtOMPL compiling and using
Replies: 1
Views: 85

Re: ExtOMPL compiling and using

Hi, After successful comppilation, you get a shared library that is supposed to go into CoppeliaSim's root folder. CoppeliaSim then loads its libraries directly form there. Compiling on WSL will probably give you an *.so file as the result which will not work on Windows - you need *.dll. I have no e...
by ohnowhathaveidone
08 Oct 2020, 12:31
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector
Replies: 6
Views: 368

Re: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector

update: sorry, it was me who mixed up y and z upvectors. it's now fixed in my fork.

cheers!
by ohnowhathaveidone
07 Oct 2020, 13:48
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector
Replies: 6
Views: 368

Re: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector

hi, at least to me, the issue still seemed to be present in the repo. i created a pull request with corrections that work for me. one issue, however, remains with importing meshes through the menu (file->import->mesh). the behavior of choosing y or z as upvector seems to be reversed in my opinion. c...
by ohnowhathaveidone
25 Sep 2020, 12:24
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector
Replies: 6
Views: 368

Re: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector

great, thanks!

no worries - if it's in the repo, i can compile myself.


cheers!
by ohnowhathaveidone
24 Sep 2020, 13:27
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector
Replies: 6
Views: 368

Re: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector

... and a small addendum: simAssimp.exportMeshes also seems to ignore the provided scaling factor.

cheers!
by ohnowhathaveidone
24 Sep 2020, 12:13
Forum: Bug reports
Topic: simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector
Replies: 6
Views: 368

simAssimp.exportMeshes ignores upvector

hi, i ran into some trouble when exporting meshes from coppeliaSim. when using simAssimp.exportMeshes , it seems to ignore the simAssimp.upVector parameter and to always export with the upvector being Y. when importing these geometries into other software (e. g. blender), this leads to the mesh bein...
by ohnowhathaveidone
28 Aug 2020, 14:55
Forum: General questions
Topic: Compatibility routines for sim.get/setObjectPosition/Orientation/Quaternion
Replies: 1
Views: 90

Compatibility routines for sim.get/setObjectPosition/Orientation/Quaternion

Hi, CoppeliaSim 4.1.0 introduced compatibility routines for sim.getObjectPosition sim.getObjectOrientation sim.getObjectQuaternion sim.setObjectPosition sim.setObjectOrientation sim.setObjectQuaterion into child scripts. The comment in the inserted code states that these may only yield wrong result ...
by ohnowhathaveidone
27 Aug 2020, 12:47
Forum: General questions
Topic: open62541 OPC UA Client
Replies: 4
Views: 487

Re: open62541 OPC UA Client

oops, didn't see that post... yes, i have something that works. but i need to check with my project partner about releasing it. you gave me a good reason to do this rather sooner than later, though. and i will definitely push to release the code on gh - otherwise it'll end up in some proprietary bin...
by ohnowhathaveidone
25 May 2020, 13:15
Forum: General questions
Topic: Experience Planners in simExtOMPL
Replies: 3
Views: 342

Re: Experience Planners in simExtOMPL

Quick update: The reason seems to be that simExtOMPL only passes space information to the planner, but experience planners - obviously - require a second argument pointing to an experience database. Makes sense.

I'll see if I can come up with a solution for this.